11. Li, T., Y. Li, T. Li, X. Hu, Y. Li, J. Liao, L. Mei, Y. Hou, B. Yang, and J.
Gu. 2025. “Experimental study on acoustic emission characteristics and
damage-failure process of seawater sea-sand ultra-high-performance
concrete under uniaxial compression.” Case Studies in Construction Mate-
rials 22: e04260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04260.
12. Prem, P. R., M. Verma, and P. S. Ambily. 2021. “Damage characteri-
zation of reinforced concrete beams under different failure modes using
acoustic emission.” Structures 30: 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
istruc.2021.01.007.
13. Ren, H., T. Li, J. Ning, and S. Song. 2023. “Analysis of damage charac-
teristics of steel fiber-reinforced concrete based on acoustic emission.”
Engineering Failure Analysis 148:107166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
engfailanal.2023.107166.
14. Wang, Y., L. J. Chen, C. Yan, N. Wang, J. Gu, Z. Z. Wang, and H. T. Zhao.
2020. “Study on Multifractal Characteristics of Acoustic Emission Sequence
of Concrete with Different Steel Fiber Content under Uniaxial Tension.”
Materials Evaluation 78 (9): 1045–54. https://doi.org/10.32548/2020.
me-04135.
15. Shen, W., H. Bai, F. Wang, C. Li, and F. Du. 2024. “Acoustic Emission
characteristics and damage evolution of Concrete-Encased CFST columns
under compressive load.” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 311: 110578.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110578.
16. Chang, J., Y. Yao, K. Liu, Y. Wang, M. Yan, and Y. Bao. 2024. “Damage
assessment of concrete beams repaired with basalt fiber-reinforced
polymer sheets through digital image correlation and acoustic emission.”
Case Studies in Construction Materials 20: e03044. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.cscm.2024.e03044.
17. Salighehdar, A., Y. Liu, D. Bozdog, and I. Florescu. 2017. “Cluster
analysis of liquidity measures in a stock market using high frequency
data.” Social Science Electronic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5281/
zenodo.808452.
18. Jun, W., W. Shitong, and D. Zhaohong. 2012. “Several issues in cluster
analysis research.” Journal of Control and Decision (3): 321–28. https://doi.
org/10.13195/j.cd.2012.03.4.wangj.013.
19. Lin, Z., D. Faning, D. Weihua, and Z. Le. 2019. “Analysis on meso-scale
damage of concrete using CT images and K-Means clustering algorithm.”
Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering 38 (5): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.11660/
slfdxb.20190505.
20. Li, W., J. Cheng, P. Jiang, and Y. Liu. 2023. “Acoustic Emission Cluster
Analysis of Composite Laminates with Different Interfacial Fiber Orienta-
tions Based on Gaussian Mixture Model.” Russian Journal of Nondestruc-
tive Testing 59 (3): 276–91. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922601143.
21. Wei, H., B. Xu, J. Li, J. Zheng, Y. Liu, and R. Lu. 2025. “Effect of
temperature on fatigue damage evolution of asphalt mixture based on
cluster analysis and acoustic emission parameters.” Engineering Fracture
Mechanics 317: 110954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.110954.
22. Yu, X., S. Montrésor, M. Bentahar, and C. Mechri. 2023. “Cluster
analysis of acoustic emission signals for the damage pattern recognition of
polymer concrete.” Applied Acoustics 211: 109533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
apacoust.2023.109533.
23. Fang, Y., Z. Yan, T. Xuedong, and G. Baolan. 2003. “K-means algorithm
based on improved density peak algorithm using genetic algorithm to
achieve k-value selection in k-means clustering algorithm.” Computer
Technology and Development 13 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-
629X.2003.01.011.
24. Cui, X., and E. Yan. 2020. “Fuzzy C-Means Cluster Analysis Based
on Variable Length String Genetic Algorithm for the Grouping of Rock
Discontinuity Sets.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 24 (11): 3237–46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-2188-2.
25. Hongbo, S., B. Azhen, and Z. Lijun. 2018. “K-means algorithm based
on improved density peak algorithm.” Statistics &Decisions (18): 20–24.
https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2018.18.004.
26. Yudong, Z., and W. Lenan. 2009. “Stock market prediction of S&P 500
via combination of improved BCO approach and BP neural network.”
Expert Systems with Applications 36 (5): 8849–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
eswa.2008.11.028.
27. Fang, L., and L. Hongyun. 2011. SPSS Data Statistics and Analysis.
M Tsinghua University Press.
28. Zhang, Z.-Q., G.-L. Li, H.-D. Wang, B.-S. Xu, and Z.-Y. Piao. 2012.
“Acoustic emission wavelet analysis of coating during contact fatigue
damage process.” Cailiao Gongcheng/Journal of Materials Engineering
2 (9): 48–53. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4381.2013.06.001 [in
Chinese].
29. Domingues, P., P. Sampaio, and P. M. Arezes. 2000. “Characterization
of interfacial properties of composite materials by acoustic emission.”
Polymer Composites 21 (4): 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10215.
ME
|
AXIALTENSION
52
M AT E R I A L S E V A L U AT I O N • M AY 2 0 2 5

LEADERSHIP
|
SCOPE
VISION 2035: STAKEHOLDER
ENGAGEMENT
In November 2021, the ASNT Board of Directors launched the
2021–2026 Strategic Plan, a bold framework focused on six pillars:
expanding and improving certification, increasing membership
value, supporting workforce entry and advancement in NDT, advo-
cating for the profession, growing globally, and enhancing research
and scholarship support.
Over the past four years, many of these objectives have been
accomplished, while others have evolved or been removed in
response to changing circumstances and lessons learned. For
example, ASNT shifted its certification focus to address long-
standing concerns with SNT-TC-1A, based on feedback from
members and the industry. This shift exemplifies ASNT’s commit-
ment to engaging stakeholders and staying responsive.
As work under the 2021 plan continues, the Board has initiated the
next phase of strategic development: Vision 2035. This new 10-year
strategic plan began in January 2025 and is slated for completion
by October, with a public unveiling at ASNT 2025 in Orlando. While
long-term planning may seem out of step in today’s fast-moving envi-
ronment, the Board believes it is essential for the sustained growth
and relevance of ASNT and the NDT profession. At the same time, we
remain committed to adaptability in the face of change.
The first step in crafting Vision 2035 is gathering a comprehensive
understanding of our stakeholders’ priorities, challenges, and oppor-
tunities. Though our Board members are well-connected within the
profession, we are committed to a structured, inclusive data-gathering
process to uncover blind spots and gain diverse insights. In May,
ASNT Board members and staff managers will be conducting inter-
views and surveys with a broad array of stakeholders. This includes
ASNT members, nonmember NDT professionals, researchers, educa-
tors, service providers, manufacturers, OEMs, regulators, equipment
suppliers, and even members of the public and media—everyone with
a stake in the quality and safety of NDT.
The insights gained from this effort will inform the development of
Vision 2035, helping the Board identify goals and strategies that reflect
the evolving needs of the NDT community. This data-driven approach
will ensure the plan is both grounded and visionary, allowing ASNT to
continue providing value and advancing safety across industries.
If you are contacted to participate in this process, we encourage
you to share your perspective—whether as an individual or on behalf
of your organization. Your input is vital to shaping a strategic direction
that benefits the entire NDT ecosystem and contributes to a safer
world.
This update is part of ASNT’s Board Transparency Project, an initia-
tive to keep members informed about the governance and strategic
direction of the Society.
NEAL J. COUTURE, FASAE, CAE
ASNT CEO
NCOUTURE@ASNT.ORG
While long-term
planning may
seem out of step in
today’s fast-moving
environment, the
Board believes it
is essential for the
sustained growth
and relevance of
ASNT and the NDT
profession.
M AY 2 0 2 5 • M AT E R I A L S E V A L U AT I O N 53