DATA-SHARING STANDARDS FOR MRO
Background
Standards are vital to the ability of
different digital systems to exchange
data. Without such standards, it would be
nearly impossible to work in a digital envi-
ronment. We envision these standards as
three stacked layers. The bottom physical
layer is the most fundamental, including
standards for the physical flow of infor-
mation (wired and wireless), hardware
and software for data management (such
as sensors), network and data-exchange
protocols, and data storage.
The next level is where much of
the engineering work of data usage
happens. In this logical or functional
layer, models are developed, enter-
prise data systems control and monitor
processes, financial data is exchanged,
and digital threads, simulations, and twins
are created. Many standards develop-
ment organizations (SDOs) are active in
these two lower layers.
However, our focus is on the top layer:
data governance, which covers data privacy
and security, intellectual property (IP) and
ownership, and sovereign control of data.
Governance standards have typically
been the purview of governments and
intergovernmental agencies such as the
United Nations’ International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO). Because many tools
for data usage are built by individual
companies for their own use, or the use
of their clients, considerations such as
standards for data sharing are not high
on their list of priorities.
There is a need for industry-created
consensus standards for data usage that
are accepted by all, providing a level
playing field. While necessary for all areas
of the aviation industry, it is especially
critical for maintenance, repair, and over-
haul (MRO) activities. A group of leading
industry stakeholders has joined together
to create an Independent Data Consortium
for Aviation (IDCA dataforaviation.org) that
seeks to address some of these gaps in the
standards landscape.
Up Until Now
As mentioned above, the players
most active in developing governance
standards for data sharing have been
governmental or legal entities. The
recently published European Data
Act is a case in point. It aims to break
down some of the barriers to accessing
aircraft-generated data—whether oper-
ational or maintenance-related—for all
participants, to reduce monopolies and
enhance fair competition. But this brings
with it higher risk related to security and
data ownership. These are issues that
need to be addressed, and that is what
the IDCA has been established to do.
Many governments, for example, do
not allow data generated within their
borders to be exported, which creates
barriers for the aviation sector because
their products cross these boundaries
regularly as part of normal operations.
Relying on narrow sovereign laws to
govern data sharing becomes cumber-
some therefore, there is a need for
industry-developed consensus standards
to govern data exchange—standards
that will be accepted by the industry as a
whole as well as by regulatory bodies.
Additionally, areas such as IP, data
security and privacy, and data ownership
need standards that will enable different
industry players to work together without
inefficiencies. While topics like data
privacy and sovereignty have been
addressed to an extent by recent rulings
from different governments, there are
many aspects of data sharing that have
not been considered.
Outlook
The IDCA was set up in 2022 to tackle
this gap in the standards landscape. The
magnitude of the data-sharing problem
can be seen in the figure to the left,
which shows just some of the mate-
rial flows in the lifecycle of an aircraft.
Due to the highly regulated nature of
the industry, there is a vast amount of
paperwork—or, in the modern era, digital
information—that must change hands
with each transaction.
Developing governance rules for each
of these transactions is the goal of the
IDCA, and the work is currently being
SCANNER
|
NDEOUTLOOK
OEM
Repair
vendor
MRO
facility
Base
operations
Parts
trader
Airline
Parts for
repair Repaired/
replaced parts
Surplus parts
New aircraft &
rotables
Serviceable A/C
&rotables
Serviceable A/C
A/C in need of checks
Overhauled
rotables
New parts
Parts
A/C &rotables
for repair
Flowchart based on
International Air
Transport Association
(IATA) concept.
14
M AT E R I A L S E V A L U AT I O N A U G U S T 2 0 2 5
SUSTAINABLE NDT
Regarding the July 2025 Materials
Evaluation article “Supporting
Sustainability for Nondestructive Testing,”
I appreciate the effort to bring sustain-
ability into the broader conversation within
NDT. It’s a timely and important topic, and
the article touches on several relevant
themes. That said, I believe a few areas
could benefit from further clarification or
balance—especially for readers who may
be less familiar with the practical and tech-
nical nuances of penetrant testing.
The article suggests that water-based
penetrants are naturally more environ-
mentally friendly than traditional oil- or
surfactant-based systems. However, this
isn’t always true. Water-based formulations
often include corrosion inhibitors, surfac-
tants, wetting agents, and other additives
that can make wastewater treatment more
complex and may require special disposal
measures. These formulations can also
be more costly to produce and manage,
so they are not necessarily cheaper just
because they contain water.
While water-based options can be
appropriate in some scenarios, they
are not universally more sustainable or
lower-impact than conventional pene-
trants—especially when full lifecycle
considerations (e.g., waste treatment, cost,
compatibility) are taken into account.
As a manufacturer, I agree that we
have a responsibility to continuously
improve our environmental and regu-
latory footprint. However, our ability to
do so is often constrained by customer
needs and specifications. Many end
users are tied to procedures that explic-
itly call out certain brands or products,
and changing those procedures typically
requires formal requalification, internal
approvals, and often third-party over-
sight. Environmental, Health, and Safety
(EHS) permits and fire department
regulations can further restrict allowable
chemistry.
The reality is that even when a more
“sustainable” option exists, customers
may not have the flexibility to implement
it without significant operational impact.
Finally, it may be worth clarifying that
AMS 2644 does not currently approve
any Level 3 or Level 4 water-based pene-
trants for final acceptance of aerospace
hardware—and it’s unlikely this will change
in the near future. These formulations
typically don’t meet the performance and
durability requirements demanded by
high-sensitivity inspections in aerospace.
I share this feedback in the spirit of
professional collaboration. Sustainability
is a conversation we all need to be part
of, and I appreciate ASNT’s initiative in
bringing these topics to the forefront.
That said, a follow-up piece or clarification
could go a long way in helping readers
understand the practical challenges that
both manufacturers and users face when
it comes to implementing more sustain-
able practices in NDT—especially in high-
spec or highly regulated environments.
Thanks for all the work you do to
elevate the industry and promote
dialogue on important issues.
PETER PELAYO
ASNT NDT LEVEL III (MT/PT)/NAS 410 LEVEL 3
LOS ALAMITOS, CA
LETTERS
|
SCANNER
done through three working groups:
Parts Tracking, Data Analytics, and
Aircraft-on-Ground (AOG) Support.
There has been a spate of recent news
stories regarding the prevalence of fake
parts or falsified airworthiness certificates
for aircraft engines and other systems.
Having the means to digitally track indi-
vidual parts from birth to disposal, and
allowing stakeholders the necessary
access to these records, would help alle-
viate some of the issues related to such
counterfeiting. This critical aspect of MRO
is being undertaken by the Parts Tracking
working group.
The Data Analytics working group is
developing governance standards for the
legal and fair sharing of operational data
among key aviation participants. These
include OEMs, operators, component
and system manufacturers, and MRO
vendors—and, due to the regulatory envi-
ronment, also the regulators. One of the
most interesting problems being tackled
by this working group is how to analyze
operational data to get to the root cause
of technical issues when the data is scat-
tered across multiple sovereignties (i.e.,
stored on servers in different countries
where the operators or MROs reside).
This challenge becomes even more
complex when the solutions to these
technical issues are based on AI algo-
rithms that depend on a preponderance
of data to converge on the right answers.
In addition to the technical barriers, there
are serious data governance issues that
must be resolved to make these solutions
feasible—that is where the IDCA’s work
comes in.
Finally, the AOG Support working
group is focused on developing data-
sharing standards that will allow different
airlines and parts suppliers (both manu-
facturers and distributors) to exchange
the required parts data, along with all
the necessary paperwork, in a timely
manner, so that an aircraft stranded in a
remote location can get back in the air in
the shortest possible time. In these cases,
the IDCA’s goal is to develop and publish
industry-consensus standards that allow
seamless access to necessary data by
authorized parties, so that inefficiencies
in the system are reduced and needless
contractual barriers are eliminated.
AUTHOR
Ravi Rajamani, PhD: drR2 Consulting
ravi@drr2-consulting.com
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
EU Data Act, https://digital-strategy.ec
.europa.eu/en/policies/data-act.
Independent Data Consortium for Aviation
(IDCA) Issue Papers, www.dataforaviation.
org/issue-papers-toc.
SAE AIR7161: Guidance for Digital Thread
Data Standards Enablement, Monitoring,
and Quantification with the Digital Thread
Framework and Digital Thread Index, https://
www.sae.org/standards/content/air7161.
NDE OUTLOOK FROM P. 14
NDE Outlook focuses on possibility thinking
for NDT and NDE. Topics may include technology
trends, research in progress, or calls to action. To
contribute, please contact Associate Technical Editor
Ripi Singh at ripi@inspiringnext.com.
A U G U S T 2 0 2 5 M AT E R I A L S E V A L U AT I O N 15
Previous Page Next Page