4. Conclusion
This study probabilistically evaluated the size of fatigue cracks
in type 304 stainless steel plates using eddy current signals. The
fatigue cracks were artificially introduced using a cyclic four-
point bending test, and eddy current tests to gather the signals
were performed using a differential-type plus point probe
driven at 200 kHz. The fatigue crack was modeled as a rectan-
gular domain with a constant width of 0.5 mm and uniform
electromagnetic properties.
Because fatigue damage changes the austenitic phase of
type 304 stainless steel into the martensitic phase, both the
electrical conductivity and magnetic properties of the discon-
tinuity were explicitly considered. The depth and length of
the crack, together with their predicted uncertainty, were esti-
mated using a Bayesian-based inverse algorithm.
The size evaluated by assuming the crack was equivalent
to air differed from the actual crack size, even though the algo-
rithm indicated the results were reliable. In contrast, assuming
the electromagnetic properties to be unknown produced better
evaluations with quantified uncertainty.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Fellows (grant number 22KJ0223).
REFERENCES
Auld, B. A., and J. C. Moulder. 1999. “Review of advances in quantitative
eddy current nondestructive evaluation.” Journal of Nondestructive Evalua-
tion 18 (1): 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021898520626.
Bowler, J. R., S. J. Norton, and D. J. Harrison. 1994. “Eddy-current inter-
action with an ideal crack. II. The inverse problem.” Journal of Applied
Physics 75 (12): 8138–44. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.356512.
Cai, C., R. Miorelli, M. Lambert, T. Rodet, D. Lesselier, and P. E. Lhuillier.
2018. “Metamodel-based Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo parameter inversion
applied in eddy current flaw characterization.” NDT &E International 99:
13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.02.004.
Camerini, C. G., L. B. Campos, V. M. A. Silva, D. S. V. Castro, R. W. F.
Santos, J. M. A. Rebello, and G. R. Pereira. 2019. “Correlation of eddy
current signals obtained from EDM notches and fatigue cracks.” Journal
of Materials Research and Technology 8 (5): 4843–48. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.031.
Chen, Z., K. Aoto, S. Kato, Y. Nagae, and K. Miya. 2002. “An experimental
study on the correlation of natural magnetization and mechanical
damages in an austenitic stainless steel.” International Journal of Applied
Electromagnetics and Mechanics 16 (3–4): 197–206. https://doi.org/10.3233/
JAE-2002-238.
Chen, Z., N. Yusa, M. Rebican, and K. Miya. 2004. “Inversion techniques
for eddy current NDE using optimization strategies and a rapid 3D
forward simulator.” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and
Mechanics 20 (3–4): 179–187. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-2004-663.
Chen, Z., N. Yusa, and K. Miya. 2009. “Some advances in numerical
analysis techniques for quantitative electromagnetic nondestructive evalu-
ation.” Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation 24 (1–2): 69–102. https://doi.
org/10.1080/10589750802195501.
Jiles, D. C. 1988. “Review of magnetic methods for nondestructive evalua-
tion.” NDT &E International 21 (5): 311–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/
0308-9126(88)90189-7.
Kinoshita, K. 2020. “Evaluation of magnetic properties in ferromagnetic
martensite particle using type 304 stainless steel wire.” AIP Advances 10
(1): 015313. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5131048.
Kinoshita, K., R. Nakazaki, and E. Matsumoto. 2014. “Variation of the
magnetic properties of the martensite phase of SUS304 steel due to tensile
deformation.” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and
Mechanics 45 (1–4): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-141811.
Kurokawa, M., T. Kamimura, and S. Fukui. 1995. “Relationship between
electric properties and width of cracks of Inconel alloy.” Proceedings of the
13th International Conference on NDE in the Nuclear and Pressure Vessel
Industries: 261–265. ASM International.
10
8
6
4
2
0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 5 10 15 20
Length (mm)
10
8
6
4
2
0
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 5 10 15 20
Length (mm)
10
8
6
4
2
0
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 5 10 15 20
Length (mm)
Figure 8. Estimated depths and lengths of the fatigue cracks when the
cracks were modeled as an air domain (no conductivity or magnetic
property): (a) TP1 (b) TP2 (c) TP3.
A U G U S T 2 0 2 5 M AT E R I A L S E V A L U AT I O N 79
Probability
density
(mm
–2 )
Probability
density
(mm
–2 )
Probability
density
(mm
–2 )
Depth
(mm)
Depth
(mm)
Depth
(mm)
Lan, X., B. Hu, S. Wang, W. Luo, and P. Fu. 2022. “Magnetic charac-
teristics and mechanism of 304 austenitic stainless steel under fatigue
loading.” Engineering Failure Analysis 136: 106182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
engfailanal.2022.106182.
Rosell, A., and G. Persson. 2012. “Finite element modelling of closed
cracks in eddy current testing.” International Journal of Fatigue 41: 30–38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.003.
Shimamoto, A., H. Ohkawara, S. Yang, D. Choi, and S. Akamatsu.
2008. “Damage evaluation using magnetic properties in stainless steels
under biaxial stress.” Materials Transactions 49 (3): 548–53. https://doi.
org/10.2320/matertrans.MRA2007245.
Tanaka, M., and H. Tsuboi. 2001. “Finite element model of natural crack
in eddy current testing problem.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 37 (5):
3125–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.952558.
Thompson, R. B. 1996. “Laboratory nondestructive evaluation technology
for materials characterization.” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 15
(3–4): 163–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00732043.
Tomizawa, T., and N. Yusa. 2024. “Bayesian data fusion of eddy current
testing for flaw characterization with uncertainty evaluation.” NDT &E
International 141: 102996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102996.
Uchimoto, T., T. Takagi, K. Ohtaki, Y. Takeda, and A. Kawakami. 2012.
“Electromagnetic modeling of fatigue cracks in plant environment for eddy
current testing.” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and
Mechanics 39 (1–4): 261–68. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-2012-1469.
Wang, J., N. Yusa, H. Pan, M. Kemppainen, I. Virkkunen, and H. Hashi-
zume. 2013. “Discussion of modeling of thermal fatigue cracks in numer-
ical simulation based on eddy current signals.” NDT &E International 55:
96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.01.012.
Xie, S., L. Wei, Z. Tong, H. Chen, Z. Chen, T. Uchimoto, and T. Takagi. 2018.
“Influence of plastic deformation and fatigue damage on electromagnetic
properties of 304 austenitic stainless steel.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
54 (8): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2018.2819123.
Yusa, N., Z. Chen, K. Miya, T. Uchimoto, and T. Takagi. 2003. “Large-scale
parallel computation for the reconstruction of natural stress corrosion
cracks from eddy current testing signals.” NDT &E International 36 (7):
449–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(03)00067-7.
Yusa, N., L. Janousek, M. Rebican, Z. Chen, K. Miya, N. Dohi, N. Chigusa,
and Y. Matsumoto. 2006. “Caution when applying eddy current inversion
to stress corrosion cracking.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 236 (2):
211–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.06.016.
Yusa, N., H. Huang, and K. Miya. 2007a. “Numerical evaluation of the
ill-posedness of eddy current problems to size real cracks.” NDT &E Inter-
national 40 (3): 185–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.10.012.
Yusa, N., S. Perrin, K. Mizuno, and K. Miya. 2007b. “Numerical modeling
of general cracks from the viewpoint of eddy current simulations.” NDT &
E International 40 (8): 577–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.04.002.
Yusa, N., and H. Hashizume. 2009. “Evaluation of stress corrosion cracking
as a function of its resistance to eddy currents.” Nuclear Engineering and
Design 239 (12): 2713–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.08.032.
Yusa, N., and H. Hashizume. 2017. “Numerical investigation of the ability
of eddy current testing to size surface breaking cracks.” Nondestructive
Testing and Evaluation 32 (1): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759
.2015.1135918.
ME
|
FATIGUECRACKS
80
M AT E R I A L S E V A L U AT I O N A U G U S T 2 0 2 5
Previous Page Next Page