capture prey, such as lemmings, burrow-
ing under thick snowpack [58, 59]. The
exceptional acoustic sensing abilities of
these animals result from a combination
of external ears and coordinated motion
of the pinna, head, and body known as
head tilting (see Figure 4). This allows
for multitasking in binaural hearing
(acoustic sensing using only two ears).
However, limited research has been con-
ducted on how their external ears and
head-tilting strategies affect sound local-
ization in the acoustic field, particularly
when detecting low-amplitude sounds
beneath packed snow. The aye-aye and
termite perform active acoustic-based
testing, actively generating vibroacous-
tic cues to detect and characterize their
environment, while the fox engages in
passive acoustic-based foraging by lis-
tening to movements and noises during
its search for prey. One of the most
promising applications for such tasks is
underground leakage detection. Gaining
insights into this process could result in
the development of advanced noncon-
tact acoustic sensing technologies for
subsurface leakage inspections, using
binaural acoustic sensing. The funda-
mental principle of aeroacoustics leak
detection revolves around the generation
and propagation of sound waves when
gas escapes from a pipeline [60]. One
of the main drawbacks of this sensing
modality is its reduced sensitivity as the
sensors move further away from the
acoustic source due to significant atten-
uation [61]. Traditionally, an array of
microphones has been used to increase
the SNR and enable effective source
localization through beamforming tech-
niques [62]. However, this technique
generates a substantial amount of data,
which is not ideal for the development of
an automated leak detection platform as
well as a digital twin approach in infra-
structure monitoring. Fortunately, this
issue has been ingeniously addressed by
biological systems such as red and arctic
foxes utilizing only two ears (binaural
sensing). Instead of relying on an
increased number of sensors to enhance
sensitivity, these biological systems
evolved external ear (pinna) shapes to
act as hardware for amplifying sound
from specific directions, a capability
further complemented by the strategic
motion and control of the pinna and
head (e.g., head tilting). This approach
could revolutionize applications such as
leak detection or human localization in
rescue missions.
The three examples mentioned are
just a few among many species that
potentially perform processes similar to
NDT/E methods. Such bioinspiration
can lead to the development of new
technologies or the evolution of existing
ones, enhancing the reliability and sensi-
tivity of NDT/E methods.
2.4. Bioinspiration Impact on
NDT Education and Workforce
Development
One of the challenges we face as instruc-
tors and researchers in the field of
NDT/E is attracting students, as we often
compete with more visibly appealing
fields like robotics and data science,
which the younger generation perceives
as more attractive career paths. However,
bioinspiration offers a unique opportu-
nity to help attract students to the field
of NDT/E. The integration of bioinspired
concepts not only allows us to pioneer
new NDE technologies that can make
our world safer, but also serves as a
compelling tool to engage and attract
students. By highlighting the innovative
intersection between nature and tech-
nology, educators can increase student
involvement in NDT/E, bringing fresh
talent into the field and encouraging the
next generation of NDT/E professionals.
3. Conclusions
These three biological examples—
aye-ayes, termites, and foxes—are
among millions of species that use pro-
cesses remarkably similar to those we
conduct in the NDT/E fields. Through
evolution, these species have developed
highly specialized sensory systems for
survival processes such as foraging for
food, avoiding predators, and communi-
cating for mating. In many cases, these
functions are analogous to detecting
defects, characterizing materials, and
assessing environmental conditions—all
achieved without disrupting their sur-
roundings. By studying these biological
systems and in particular the processes,
for example tap-scanning, we can gain
valuable insights and inspiration for
advancing NDT technologies. The pre-
cision and efficiency seen in “nature’s
NDE specialists” offer promising avenues
for pioneering more adaptive, autono-
mous, and efficient NDT/E technologies,
particularly in challenging environments.
Furthermore, bioinspiration provides an
engaging platform for NDT/E education
and workforce development, attract-
ing younger generations to the field of
NDT/E and fostering the next wave of
innovation as well as keeping the world
a safer place to live.
As we continue to identify and
explore new “nature’s NDE special-
ists,” the potential for revolutionary
advancements in robotics, sensing,
and materials—specifically focused
on NDT/E and material characteriza-
tion processes—becomes increasingly
Figure 4. Red fox
head tilting.
A P R I L 2 0 2 5 M AT E R I A L S E V A L U AT I O N 31
CREDIT:
KERRY
HARGROVE
evident, opening possibilities for innova-
tive NDT/E methods with applications
in industries such as infrastructure,
aerospace, and environmental moni-
toring. Applications in hard-to-access
inspection areas, advanced processes
for detecting undetectable discontinu-
ities, data management with reduced
dimensionality and size, and increased
autonomy are just a few areas where
bioinspiration can significantly impact
NDT/E technologies.
AUTHOR
Ehsan Dehghan-Niri: Intelligent Structures
and Non-destructive Evaluation laboratory, The
School of Manufacturing Systems and Networks,
Arizona State University nde@asu.edu
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Our bioinspired NDT research was supported
by the US National Science Foundation CAREER
Award under Grant No. 2320815. We would like
to extend our sincere appreciation to the Duke
Lemur Center (DLC) for their support through
the DBI-SABI award (Grant No. 2314898).
Additionally, we express our gratitude to the
dedicated research team at DLC, including
Dr. Erin Ehmke, Ms. Julie McKinney, Ms. Gabbi
Hirschkorn, and Ms. Alexis Sharp, for their
invaluable assistance in setting up this noninva-
sive behavioral study.
Although it is uncommon to acknowledge
animals in scientific publications, I would like to
take this opportunity to recognize two specific
aye-ayes from the DLC, Merlin and Medusa.
While I never had the chance to meet Merlin,
an article written by Dr. Erin Ehmke about him,
following his passing, sparked my interest in
bioinspired NDT. Merlin contributed to several
research projects at DLC, and even after his
death, his CT scan helped us better understand
the external auditory system of aye-ayes and
its impact on acoustic field measurements.
Medusa, a younger aye-aye at DLC, recently
assisted our team in collecting thermal images
of the tapping process, and we are grateful for
her contribution to our research.
CITATION
Materials Evaluation 83 (4): 28-33
https://doi.org/10.32548/2025.me-04490
©2025 American Society for Nondestructive
Testing
REFERENCES
1. Yang, Y., C. Ai, W. Chen, J. Zhen, X. Kong,
and Y. Jiang. 2023. “Recent advances in sources
of bio-inspiration and materials for robotics
and actuators.” Small Methods. https://doi.
org/10.1002/smtd.202300338.
2. Thewissen, J. G. M., and S. Nummela (eds.).
2008. Sensory evolution on the Threshold.
University of California Press.
3. Munoz, N. E., and D. T. Blumstein. January
2020. “Optimal multisensory integration.”
Behavioral Ecology 31 (1): 184–93. https://doi.
org/10.1093/beheco/arz175.
4. Mishra, S., Z. Yılmaz-Serçinoglu, ˘ H. Moradi,
D. Bhatt, C. I Kuru, and F. Ulucan-Karnak.
2023. “Recent advances in bioinspired sustain-
able sensing technologies.” Nano-Structures
&Nano-Objects. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
nanoso.2023.100974.
5. Tang, W., Q. Yang, H. Xu, Y. Guo, J. Zhang, C.
Ouyang, L. Meng, and X. Liu. 2024. “Review of
bio-inspired image sensors for efficient machine
vision.” Advanced Photonics 6 (2). https://doi.
org/10.1117/1.AP.6.2.024001.
6. Zhao, Z., Q. Yang, R. Li, J. Yang, Q. Liu, B.
Zhu, C. Weng, et al. 2024. “A comprehen-
sive review on the evolution of bio-inspired
sensors from aquatic creatures.” Cell Reports
Physical Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
xcrp.2024.102064.
7. Lenk, C., K. Ved, S. Durstewitz, T. Ivanov,
M. Ziegler, and P. Hövel. 2024. “Bio-inspired,
neuromorphic acoustic sensing.” Bio-Inspired
Information Pathways: 287–315. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-031-36705-2_12.
8. del Valle, M. 2011. “Bioinspired sensor
systems.” Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/
s111110180.
9. Zhou, Y., Z. Yan, Y. Yang, Z. Wang, P. Lu, P.
Yuan, and B. He. 2024. “Bioinspired sensors
and applications in intelligent robots: a review.”
Robotic Intelligence and Automation. https://
doi.org/10.1108/RIA-07-2023-0088.
10. Liu, P., M. N. Huda, L. Sun, and H. Yu.
December 2020. “A survey on underactuated
robotic systems: Bio-inspiration, trajectory
planning and control.” Mechatronics 72:102443.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics
.2020.102443.
11. Ren, L., B. Li, G. Wei, K. Wang, Z. Song, Y.
Wei, L. Ren, and Q. Liu. 2021. “Biology and
bioinspiration of soft robotics: Actuation,
sensing, and system integration.” iScience 24 (9):
103075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103075.
12. Bergmann, J. B., D. Moatsou, U. Steiner,
and B. D. Wilts. 2022. “Bio-inspired materials
to control and minimise insect attachment.”
Bioinspiration &Biomimetics. https://doi.
org/10.1088/1748-3190/ac91b9.
13. Raibert, M., K. Blankespoor, G. Nelson, and
R. Playter. 2008. “BigDog, the rough-terrain
quadruped robot.” In Proceedings of the 17th
World Congress: 10822–10825.
14. Halder, S., K. Afsari, E. Chiou, R. Patrick,
and K. A. Hamed. April 2023. “Construction
inspection &monitoring with quadruped robots
in future human-robot teaming: A preliminary
study.” Journal of Building Engineering 65:105814.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105814.
15. Lopez-Arreguin, A. J. R., and S. Montenegro.
2020. “Towards bio-inspired robots for under-
ground and surface exploration in planetary
environments: An overview and novel devel-
opments inspired in sand-swimmers,” Heliyon.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04148.
16. Sun, J. Y., Y. W. Yan, F. D. Li, and Z. J. Zhang.
December 2021. “Generative design of bioin-
spired wings based on deployable hindwings
of Anomala Corpulenta Motschulsky.” Micron
(Oxford, England) 151:103150. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.micron.2021.103150.
17. Prakash, A., A. R. Nair, H. Arunav, R. P. R.,
V. M. Akhil, C. Tawk, and K. V. Shankar. 2024.
“Bioinspiration and biomimetics in marine
robotics: a review on current applications and
future trends.” Bioinspiration &Biomimetics.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad3265.
18. Youssef, S. M., M. Soliman, M. A. Saleh, M.
A. Mousa, M. Elsamanty, and A. G. Radwan.
2022. “Underwater soft robotics: a review of
bioinspiration in design, actuation, modeling,
and control.” Micromachines. https://doi.
org/10.3390/mi13010110.
19. Balakrishnan, S. 2010. “An numerical elastic
model for deforming bat pinnae.” Thesis.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1936.8163.
20. Yin, X., P. Qiu, L. Yang, and R. Müller. 2017.
“Horseshoe bats and Old World leaf-nosed
bats have two discrete types of pinna motions.”
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141
(5): 3011–17. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4982042.
21. Feng, L., L. Gao, H. Lu, and R. Muller. 2012.
“Noseleaf Dynamics during Pulse Emission
in Horseshoe Bats.” PLoS One 7 (5): e34685.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034685.
22. Ahmed, F., M. Waqas, B. Jawed, A. Manzoor
Soomro, S. Kumar, A. Hina, U. Khan, et al. 2022.
“Decade of bio-inspired soft robots: A review.”
Smart Materials and Structures. https://doi.
org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac6e15.
23. Husbands, P., Y. Shim, M. Garvie, A. Dewar,
N. Domcsek, P. Graham, J. Knight, T. Nowotny,
and A. Philippides. 2021. “Recent advances in
evolutionary and bio-inspired adaptive robotics:
Exploiting embodied dynamics.” Applied Intel-
ligence 51 (9): 6467–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10489-021-02275-9.
24. Wang, J., S. Lin, and A. Liu. 2023. “Bioin-
spired perception and navigation of service
robots in indoor environments: a review.”
Biomimetics. https://doi.org/10.3390/
biomimetics8040350.
25. Ha, S. A., and G. Lu. 2020. “A review of
recent research on bio-inspired structures and
materials for energy absorption applications.”
Composites Part B: Engineering. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107496.
26. Jiang, Z., Y. Ma, and Y. Xiong. October
2023. “Bio-inspired generative design for engi-
neering products: A case study for flapping
wing shape exploration.” Advanced Engineering
Informatics 58:102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aei.2023.102240.
27. Budholiya, S., A. Bhat, S. A. Raj, M. T.
Hameed Sultan, A. U. Md Shah, and A. A. Basri.
2021. “State of the art review about bio-inspired
design and applications: An aerospace perspec-
tive.” Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/
app11115054.
NDT TUTORIAL
|
BIOINSPIREDNDE
32
M AT E R I A L S E V A L U AT I O N A P R I L 2 0 2 5
Previous Page Next Page